Last week’s research revealed the truly crooked nature of New Zealand’s Jehovah’s Witness organisation.
Apostate Shayne had conveyed this reality to me at the beginning but, true to form, I required verification; it was not long before I found it.
“A group of alleged sexual abuse survivors from across Canada have filed a $66-million class-action lawsuit against the Jehovah’s Witnesses…”
In the white-collar regard, given their astronomical level of financial misappropriation, the J-Dubs are a criminal enterprise; in the other regard, the physical regard, the perpetrator/victim regard, there are members of the Jehovah’s Witness congregation who are the most loathsome of criminals.
“An Australian Royal Commission in 2015 found there had been recorded allegations, reports, or complaints of child sexual abuse against 1006 Jehovah’s Witness members since 1950.”
The Witnesses behind these acts are rapists, they are molesters, and they are paedophiles, but the worst thing, regarding the above claims, these are only the few instances where the victim was strong enough to turn their back on a lifetime of teachings and to call attention to the alleged misconduct; actual abuse case numbers are likely much higher.
“The lawsuit alleges that the religious sect did not do enough to protect children from sexual predators and routinely failed to report suspected cases to police.”
As for the cretinous individuals who commit these atrocities, if someone from the worldly population were to question their actions, these J-Dubs would likely spin some scripted nonsense about how their actions are justified because they are ‘doing God’s work’, as though they genuinely believe what they are doing is justifiable.
“If New Zealand’s … also looked into child sexual abuse in religions, the numbers here would be comparable and, proportionally, worse than the paedophilia scandal that has rocked Catholicism.”
What right does any institution have, once affiliated with a so-called higher power, to then use that supposed power as justification to act in a deplorable manner?
“…Was just 8-years-old when a man from his congregation, in his 30s, started grooming him. It started with movies and bowling but soon they would just be at the man’s house. Then there was pornography, violent movies and hard liquor. That was followed by oral sex and nudity.”
The J-Dub institution endeavours to maintain its air of innocence by preaching, then reiterating the statement, they ‘abhor sexual abuse’; yet for as long as ‘sins require two witnesses’ instances of this abhorrent abuse will continue because, Jehovah’s Witnesses, within their own congregation, will have the power to act as they please.
“If you have a policy that requires a second witness to child abuse, it means that virtually every allegation is going to go no further. And that puts the child at risk. And it protects the abuser.”
Authorities in New Zealand appear unwilling to question the motives of a religious institution as established as the Jehovah’s Witness movement; of course, when an entity’s doctrines are founded largely on make-believe, that entity has the power to control every aspect of its own story.
“As many have pointed out, the only two witnesses to child sexual abuse tend to be the victim and perpetrator.”
Religion is a business founded on control and nothing more, it does more harm than it does good, it ruins lives; it ought to be outlawed.
Enough said.
Article by Tim Walker
Edited by Haddie Naff
Photography by Taeka Brake